bOseN jGa nic di huMs gX da oRaNg,,,, bLum pada pLng.. mu tDuR tP gX biSa...
mU bLjR bWt bSoK UTS kEzMeN...agX maLay... pReseNtasi pUla bSK pSyCHo paNdididkan...
huhuhuh lIeR eUy...
meTlIt msih aGx RaGu,, pa jDi ya jDUL na itu ????
pERKemBanGaN bELum pas ma jUdUL na apa ????
Selasa, 28 April 2009
Kamis, 23 April 2009
kNoWiNg.........
akhiR na bisa juGa nonton "kNowiNg".....
bErsa bgatZ fResh na....
tugaS2 qu i'm cOmiNg... hohohoohoo
mKsH yaWh aTz wKtu na.....
^_^
bErsa bgatZ fResh na....
tugaS2 qu i'm cOmiNg... hohohoohoo
mKsH yaWh aTz wKtu na.....
^_^
Rabu, 22 April 2009
bEdaH sKriPsi Bab1
1. Isi dari bab 1 skripsi yang berjudul “ TINGKAT RELIGIUS PADA LANSIA”, yaitu:
a. Latar Belakang
b. Pembatasan dan Perumusan Masalah
• Pembatasan Masalah
• Perumusan Masalah: permasalahan Umum dan Khusus
2. Latar Belakang
3. analisis isi bab 1 berdasarkan 4 asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah
• berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan empirism dilihat dari judul skripsi yang kami bedah yaitu yang berjudul “ Tingkat Religiusitas pada Lansia “ karena dalam penyelesaian skripsi ini telah dilakukan penilitian di sebuah Panti Sosial Tresna Werdha (PS. TW) Bakti Mulia 03, Cengkareng, Jakarta Barat dan Lansia yang tinggal di Komplek Perumahan Walikota Jakarta Barat. Dan dari hasil penilitian terdapat perbedaan tingkat religiusitas pada lansia yang berada di panti dan non panti, karena keadaan lingkungan mempengaruhi individu.
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan determinism karena pada isi sub bab latar belakang, penulis mengutip kalimat dari teori-teori dan penelitian terdahulu.
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan parsimony karena dalam skripsi dijelaskan dari kalimat-kalimat yang umum ke khusus. Dapat dilihat pada pembatasan masalah yang befokus pada lansia dan religiusitas dan perumusan masalah (umum).
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan testability karena skripsi ini dapat dilakukan pengujian secara empiris seperti identifikasi variabel-variabel penelitian, definisi operasional variabel penelitian, populasi dan metode pengambilan sempel, teknik pengumpulan data, prosedur uji instrumen penelitian, validitas dan relaibilitas instrumen penelitian, dan metode analisa data.
a. Latar Belakang
b. Pembatasan dan Perumusan Masalah
• Pembatasan Masalah
• Perumusan Masalah: permasalahan Umum dan Khusus
2. Latar Belakang
3. analisis isi bab 1 berdasarkan 4 asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah
• berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan empirism dilihat dari judul skripsi yang kami bedah yaitu yang berjudul “ Tingkat Religiusitas pada Lansia “ karena dalam penyelesaian skripsi ini telah dilakukan penilitian di sebuah Panti Sosial Tresna Werdha (PS. TW) Bakti Mulia 03, Cengkareng, Jakarta Barat dan Lansia yang tinggal di Komplek Perumahan Walikota Jakarta Barat. Dan dari hasil penilitian terdapat perbedaan tingkat religiusitas pada lansia yang berada di panti dan non panti, karena keadaan lingkungan mempengaruhi individu.
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan determinism karena pada isi sub bab latar belakang, penulis mengutip kalimat dari teori-teori dan penelitian terdahulu.
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan parsimony karena dalam skripsi dijelaskan dari kalimat-kalimat yang umum ke khusus. Dapat dilihat pada pembatasan masalah yang befokus pada lansia dan religiusitas dan perumusan masalah (umum).
• Berdasarkan ke empat asumsi dasar pada metode ilmiah skripsi ini dapat dikatakan testability karena skripsi ini dapat dilakukan pengujian secara empiris seperti identifikasi variabel-variabel penelitian, definisi operasional variabel penelitian, populasi dan metode pengambilan sempel, teknik pengumpulan data, prosedur uji instrumen penelitian, validitas dan relaibilitas instrumen penelitian, dan metode analisa data.
reSuMe iNteLLigeNce
Theories of Intelligence
There are almost as many theories of intelegence as there are definitions. The first, as example fied in the theories of Spearman, Thurstone, Guilford, and Cattell and Horn. These theories’ emphasis on individual differences in intelligence has had great impact on the development of intelligence tests in use today. In fact, the approach is often called the psychometric approach because it emphasizes the measurement of intelligence. The second major approach is seen in Sternberg’s work. Instead of indentifying the particular factors that define intelligence, Stenberg looks at the processes by which a person uses information to solves problems.
Charles Spearman
Charles Spearman was born on September 10, 1863 in the town of London. One the earliest theorists, Charles Spearman, proposed a “g” and several “s” factors in intelligence. The “g” factor (general intelligence), was thought to be an inherited intellectual capacity that influences all-around performance, and the “s” factors (specific abilities) were said to account for the differences between scores on different tasks, say, verbal and mathematical. Spearman justified this division by pointing to the common phenomenon that people who score high on one kind of test usually do well on others but that their scores on various abilities do differ somewhat.
Spearman's most notable contribution to intelligence testing is the idea that all aspects of intelligence, to a certain extent, are correlated with each other. In particular, Spearman believed that only two factors are measured by intelligence tests, a general intelligence factor common to all tests and a specific factor that is distinctive in each test (Williams, Zimmerman, Zumbo, & Ross, 2003). This means that there is a general ability factor that will determine how well each individual does on any particular assessment of cognitive functioning. However, in addition to this general factor, there is also a specific factor unique to each test that will also influence the overall assessment levels. Spearman believed both factors jointly determined the measured value of human intelligence on any particular test.
Spearman came to the two factor conclusion by using methods of factor analysis comparing intelligence measures across a diverse range of samples. By organizing the measured data into matrices, Spearman isolated the factors that were correlated with other factors in determining intelligence levels (Williams, Zimmerman, Zumbo, & Ross, 2003). The end, Spearman found that every single variable was linked to each other to some degree and that a single general intelligence factor could account for all variables. Furthermore, any small inconsistencies in the variables are due to the specific intelligence factors that are unique to each assessment. In this way, all aspects of cognitive functioning can be represented in terms of two distinct factors of intelligence.
There are almost as many theories of intelegence as there are definitions. The first, as example fied in the theories of Spearman, Thurstone, Guilford, and Cattell and Horn. These theories’ emphasis on individual differences in intelligence has had great impact on the development of intelligence tests in use today. In fact, the approach is often called the psychometric approach because it emphasizes the measurement of intelligence. The second major approach is seen in Sternberg’s work. Instead of indentifying the particular factors that define intelligence, Stenberg looks at the processes by which a person uses information to solves problems.
Charles Spearman
Charles Spearman was born on September 10, 1863 in the town of London. One the earliest theorists, Charles Spearman, proposed a “g” and several “s” factors in intelligence. The “g” factor (general intelligence), was thought to be an inherited intellectual capacity that influences all-around performance, and the “s” factors (specific abilities) were said to account for the differences between scores on different tasks, say, verbal and mathematical. Spearman justified this division by pointing to the common phenomenon that people who score high on one kind of test usually do well on others but that their scores on various abilities do differ somewhat.
Spearman's most notable contribution to intelligence testing is the idea that all aspects of intelligence, to a certain extent, are correlated with each other. In particular, Spearman believed that only two factors are measured by intelligence tests, a general intelligence factor common to all tests and a specific factor that is distinctive in each test (Williams, Zimmerman, Zumbo, & Ross, 2003). This means that there is a general ability factor that will determine how well each individual does on any particular assessment of cognitive functioning. However, in addition to this general factor, there is also a specific factor unique to each test that will also influence the overall assessment levels. Spearman believed both factors jointly determined the measured value of human intelligence on any particular test.
Spearman came to the two factor conclusion by using methods of factor analysis comparing intelligence measures across a diverse range of samples. By organizing the measured data into matrices, Spearman isolated the factors that were correlated with other factors in determining intelligence levels (Williams, Zimmerman, Zumbo, & Ross, 2003). The end, Spearman found that every single variable was linked to each other to some degree and that a single general intelligence factor could account for all variables. Furthermore, any small inconsistencies in the variables are due to the specific intelligence factors that are unique to each assessment. In this way, all aspects of cognitive functioning can be represented in terms of two distinct factors of intelligence.
hey....hey....
nMa Q raTna puRijaYaNti....lahIr di poNoRogo tGL 5maRet1989....tPi di BsaRkaN di jaKarTa...peNdidikan sKraNg di faKulats PsIkOlogi UIN jaKaRta,, sBlumnya... tK aiSyaH 32 jaKrta trus sDi aL-baYyinah...trUs mTs. neGeri 4 jakarta aNd maN 7 jaKaRta....paLing suKa baca ne...kumpulaN buKu psYco, nOveL... komik da pula...bagi yaNg mu pinjaM siLakahkan, dTg ja kerumaH aLmtnya..msH di jgaKarsa...musIk sE..rata2 iNdonesia n jaPaN pula...bLog ne mu isi tTg psYcHoLogy.. aTupun cRt2 laInnya.... shaRe yaWh... mKsH...
nMa Q raTna puRijaYaNti....lahIr di poNoRogo tGL 5maRet1989....tPi di BsaRkaN di jaKarTa...peNdidikan sKraNg di faKulats PsIkOlogi UIN jaKaRta,, sBlumnya... tK aiSyaH 32 jaKrta trus sDi aL-baYyinah...trUs mTs. neGeri 4 jakarta aNd maN 7 jaKaRta....paLing suKa baca ne...kumpulaN buKu psYco, nOveL... komik da pula...bagi yaNg mu pinjaM siLakahkan, dTg ja kerumaH aLmtnya..msH di jgaKarsa...musIk sE..rata2 iNdonesia n jaPaN pula...bLog ne mu isi tTg psYcHoLogy.. aTupun cRt2 laInnya.... shaRe yaWh... mKsH...
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
.jpg)